Book a demo
Case intelligence for family law

The evidence is overwhelming. The case isn't.

Curia turns thousands of texts, emails, and records from a custody or divorce matter into a clear, source-traced roadmap — so your hours go to strategy, not sorting.

Curia organizes and surfaces. You decide what's relevant, admissible, and strategic.
Book a demo See what you get

Working with family-law attorneys across Arkansas — expanding soon.

Henderson v. Henderson
Issue Index
Auto-organized
Communication & co-parenting
31 messages · traced to source contradiction flagged
Financial conduct
18 records · bank + text references reconciled
Safety & protective-order history
7 incidents · chronological, dated to source
Child welfare & schedule
24 entries · calendar + message corroboration
Reads every kind of evidence Texts & chats Email Call logs Financials Records & filings Photos Audio
The line that never moves

Curia organizes and surfaces. You decide what's relevant, admissible, and strategic.

The problem

Every matter buries you in evidence before you can build the case.

The facts that decide a custody or divorce case arrive as a disordered pile — and turning it into usable work product is slow, billable, and easy to get wrong.

20–30

Hours per matter, by hand

Printing, reading, and sorting messages into order before the strategy work even begins.

Internal estimate — our own, not an external figure.
One

Missed exchange can turn a case

A single buried contradiction or timeline gap is the difference between a strong position and a weak one.

New

Liability for the wrong tools

Under the 2025 ethics rules, AI output is now the supervising attorney's responsibility. Getting this wrong has consequences.

2025 Ark. 115 (RPC 5.3); In re McClain, Ark. 2025.
The risk isn't theoretical, and it's local.
In In re McClain (Ark., 2025), an attorney in an expedited juvenile matter filed AI-hallucinated citations and was ordered to show cause. Family law, AI risk, and real consequences — in our own backyard.
What you get

Disordered evidence in. A source-traced roadmap out.

Whatever the client hands over — in whatever format — Curia organizes it by issue, traces every point to its source, and flags what doesn't line up. Nothing interpreted. Everything verifiable.

Comes in — any format
4,200 text messages 3 devices
Email exports .pst, .eml
Bank & financial records PDF
Court filings & orders scanned
Photos & screenshots 240 files
Voicemail & audio transcribed
Comes out — organized by issue, traced to source
Co-parenting communicationSupports client
Texts — Mar 4, 2025 · msg 1,884
Texts — Mar 11, 2025 · msg 2,041
Possible contradiction: Mar 11 message conflicts with sworn statement in financial affidavit (p. 3). Surfaced for your review.
Financial conductNeeds attention
Bank stmt — Feb 2025 · p. 7, line 22
Texts — Feb 19, 2025 · msg 1,502
Safety & protective historyDocumented
Police report — Jan 2025 · chronological

The intake engine is format-agnostic. If it's evidence, Curia can read it, organize it, and trace it — whatever the matter.

How it works

Four steps. From a pile of evidence to a roadmap you can work from.

No new system to learn. The client's evidence comes in securely; an attorney-ready package comes back.

1

Evidence comes in

The client securely uploads their own evidence — texts, email, records, photos, audio, in any format.

2

Organized by issue

Curia sorts everything into an index by issue and builds a timeline — every point traced to its source file.

3

Contradictions flagged

Where the record doesn't line up, Curia surfaces it — descriptively, never interpreted — for your review.

4

You review and decide

You get a source-traced package in minutes instead of hours — and you make every call that matters.

You stay in control

A faster review. A more complete one. Never a substitute for your judgment.

Curia exists to make the review you're already required to do fast, complete, and verifiable — not to make the calls only a lawyer can make.

Curia does

Organizes the evidence by issue
Traces every point back to its source
Flags contradictions — descriptively, never interpreted
Decodes slang and abbreviations in plain language

The attorney decides

What's relevant
What's admissible
The strategy and the argument
Every call that reaches the client or the court

The risk isn't what you review — it's what you ran out of time to reach. Curia reads the entire record, so the exchange you'd never have had hours to find still surfaces for your judgment. Less missed. Less exposure.

Security & confidentiality

Built by a security engineer, for the most sensitive files you hold.

Curia's architecture was designed by a co-founder whose background is in cybersecurity and agentic AI. Client confidentiality isn't a feature we added — it's the foundation the product sits on.

Sealed, isolated instances

Every firm and every client matter lives in its own walled-off environment. Cases never touch each other, and firms never share infrastructure.

Never trains a public AI

Your client's evidence is never used to train a public model, and never passes through one. What goes in stays in your matter.

Two-factor access

Access to every matter is protected by two-factor authentication. Only the people you authorize can open a file.

Under your duty of confidentiality

Curia operates under your direction and your professional duty of confidentiality — designed to fit the obligations you already carry, not complicate them.

Note for build: exact security claims pending Mauricio's written confirmation before this section goes live. Copy is modular — wording can tighten without changing the layout.
Who we are

Built by people who lived this problem.

Mauricio Iglesias
Mauricio Iglesias
Co-founder · Product & Engineering

Mauricio built the first version of Curia during his own custody battle — drowning in the same evidence pile this product now untangles. His background is in cybersecurity and agentic AI — which is why the agents that do the sorting run inside an architecture where confidentiality and isolation sit at the core, not the edges.

Leah Misenheimer
Leah Misenheimer
Co-founder · Go-to-market & Partnerships

Leah leads Curia's work with attorneys and the family-law and advocacy community. Her background is a decade in relationship-driven sales and a competitive grind that taught her the long game — she's here to earn the trust of a profession that runs on it.

Design partners

We're building this with practicing attorneys.

Curia is being shaped alongside family-law attorneys handling real matters — so the work product fits how you actually practice. The pressure behind it is already here:

The rules arrived

2025 ethics amendments put AI output squarely on the supervising attorney.

2025 Ark. 115 · ABA Op. 512

The risk is local

An Arkansas attorney was ordered to show cause over AI-hallucinated citations in a juvenile matter.

In re McClain, Ark. 2025

The pattern is growing

1,600+ court decisions worldwide have now addressed AI-hallucinated filings.

AI Hallucination Cases DB, 2026

See your own kind of matter, organized.

Book a 30-minute demo. We'll walk you through a real, de-identified matter and show you the roadmap you'd get — no pitch, just the work product.

Book a demo

Or reach Leah directly — leah@curiatech.co